FFOG vs. CHAT

In the year-to-date period, FFOG achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 3.09% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FFOG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FFOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOG and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FFOG nor CHAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FFOG drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOG and CHAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) is 8.61%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that FFOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.