FFND vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FFND (The Future Fund Active ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFND returned 20.05%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for TDVG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFND charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

FFND vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 8.26% return.

FFND

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 17.29%
• 3Y*: 20.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFND vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF	5.51%	19.38%	24.05%	40.05%	-39.84%	-3.43%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.26%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FFND and TDVG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2021	0.74

The correlation between FFND and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFND vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFND	TDVG
Technology	30.4%	26.2%
Industrials	14.0%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	7.2%
Healthcare	12.0%	12.4%
Financial Services	11.7%	19.3%
Communication Services	9.1%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	6.9%
Utilities	1.8%	3.8%
Energy	1.5%	5.3%
Basic Materials	1.4%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.6%

Return for Risk

FFND vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFND

FFND Risk / Return Rank: 41
FFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FFND Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FFND Martin Ratio Rank: 47

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFND vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFND	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.75	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.51	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	2.35	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	9.64	-2.51

FFND vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFND Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFND and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFND vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFND	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.84%	-19.20%	-28.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-7.24%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-14.02%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-0.61%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.58%	-3.72%	-14.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	1.76%	+0.67%

Volatility

FFND vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.70%. This indicates that FFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFND	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	2.70%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.91%	7.60%	+3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	9.76%	+3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.97%	13.92%	+11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.97%	13.90%	+11.07%

FFND vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFND vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF	0.62%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFND and TDVG in my portfolio?

FFND and TDVG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFND or TDVG?

FFND has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to TDVG (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFND dropped -47.84% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, FFND or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, FFND leads with 20.05% vs 15.63% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFND or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, FFND has performed better with a 20.05% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFND or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFND or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.62% for FFND.

What is the main difference between FFND and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FFND and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.