PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFND vs. JOET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFND vs. JOET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFND vs. JOET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFND
The Future Fund Active ETF
-4.12%19.38%24.05%40.05%-39.84%-4.81%
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
-4.69%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%6.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a -4.12% return, which is significantly higher than JOET's -4.69% return.


FFND

1D
3.05%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-4.12%
6M
-2.85%
1Y
16.56%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
10Y*

JOET

1D
2.77%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-4.69%
6M
-6.33%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFND vs. JOET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than JOET's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFND vs. JOET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFND
FFND Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFND Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFND Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFND vs. JOET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFNDJOETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.54

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

0.89

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

0.91

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.77

3.54

+2.23

FFND vs. JOET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the JOET Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFND and JOET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFNDJOETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.54

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between FFND and JOET is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFND vs. JOET - Dividend Comparison

FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than JOET's 0.69% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FFND
The Future Fund Active ETF
0.68%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.69%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%

Drawdowns

FFND vs. JOET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than JOET's maximum drawdown of -26.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and JOET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFNDJOETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.84%

-26.58%

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-11.87%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-7.93%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-7.36%

-12.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.04%

-0.22%

Volatility

FFND vs. JOET - Volatility Comparison

The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) at 5.59%. This indicates that FFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JOET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFNDJOETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

5.59%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

10.37%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

18.86%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

17.69%

+7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.35%

17.63%

+7.72%