FFND vs. SPMO
FFND (The Future Fund Active ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFND is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by The Future Fund, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. FFND is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFND returned 21.85%/yr vs 43.04%/yr for SPMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFND charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FFND vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
FFND
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 21.25%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
FFND vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF | 6.70% | 19.38% | 24.05% | 40.05% | -39.84% | -4.81% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFND and SPMO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FFND and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FFND vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFND
SPMO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
FFND
SPMO
Industrials
FFND
SPMO
Financial Services
FFND
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
FFND
SPMO
Healthcare
FFND
SPMO
Communication Services
FFND
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
FFND
SPMO
Utilities
FFND
SPMO
Basic Materials
FFND
SPMO
Energy
FFND
SPMO
Real Estate
FFND
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFND vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FFND
SPMO
FFND vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFND | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.64 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 14.17 | -5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFND | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.62 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.01 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
FFND vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFND | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -30.95% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -12.70% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -20.13% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | 0.00% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -4.60% | -14.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 3.26% | -0.86% |
Volatility
FFND vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) is 3.78%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that FFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFND | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 7.35% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 14.39% | -4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 17.64% | -4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 19.30% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 20.31% | +4.73% |
FFND vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFND vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFND and SPMO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FFND (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFND dropped -47.84% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 43.04% vs 21.85% for FFND. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FFND has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 43.04% return vs 21.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FFND.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.61% for FFND.
FFND is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FFND and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFND and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer