FFNAX vs. PALDX
FFNAX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FFNAX returned 4.81%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFNAX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFNAX having a 6.51% return and PALDX slightly lower at 6.25%.
FFNAX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.62%
PALDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- —
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFNAX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A | 6.51% | 12.83% | 7.02% | 11.27% | -13.89% | 7.72% | 12.74% | 15.56% | -4.46% | 2.27% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 6.25% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFNAX and PALDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FFNAX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFNAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
FFNAX
PALDX
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFNAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.92 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 13.42 | -1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFNAX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFNAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -26.16% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.20% | -5.96% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.60% | -16.06% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.77% | -20.47% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.52% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -4.07% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 1.29% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) is 3.15%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that FFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFNAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 3.35% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.10% | 6.76% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.19% | 8.38% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 12.18% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 12.69% | -4.97% |
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFNAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFNAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
FFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than PALDX's 5.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFNAX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A | 3.40% | 3.69% | 2.54% | 2.20% | 5.40% | 2.06% | 2.08% | 3.37% | 4.21% | 2.32% | 1.21% | 2.88% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.10% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FFNAX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PALDX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FFNAX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFNAX dropped -31.88% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFNAX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer