PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFNAX vs. JNBSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFNAX and JNBSX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FFNAX vs. JNBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) and JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.85%
4.35%
FFNAX
JNBSX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFNAX:

1.33

JNBSX:

1.45

Sortino Ratio

FFNAX:

1.89

JNBSX:

2.01

Omega Ratio

FFNAX:

1.24

JNBSX:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

FFNAX:

0.94

JNBSX:

1.00

Martin Ratio

FFNAX:

6.46

JNBSX:

6.91

Ulcer Index

FFNAX:

1.30%

JNBSX:

1.34%

Daily Std Dev

FFNAX:

6.30%

JNBSX:

6.42%

Max Drawdown

FFNAX:

-29.90%

JNBSX:

-23.60%

Current Drawdown

FFNAX:

-1.42%

JNBSX:

-1.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFNAX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than JNBSX's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FFNAX has underperformed JNBSX with an annualized return of 3.79%, while JNBSX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.17% annualized return.


FFNAX

YTD

1.70%

1M

1.70%

6M

3.84%

1Y

7.86%

5Y*

3.66%

10Y*

3.79%

JNBSX

YTD

1.84%

1M

1.84%

6M

4.35%

1Y

8.59%

5Y*

3.06%

10Y*

4.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFNAX vs. JNBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFNAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than JNBSX's 0.60% expense ratio.


FFNAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A
Expense ratio chart for FFNAX: current value at 0.83% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.83%
Expense ratio chart for JNBSX: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFNAX vs. JNBSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFNAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFNAX is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFNAX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFNAX is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFNAX is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFNAX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFNAX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JNBSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JNBSX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JNBSX is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JNBSX is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JNBSX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JNBSX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JNBSX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFNAX vs. JNBSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) and JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFNAX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.331.45
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFNAX, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.892.01
The chart of Omega ratio for FFNAX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.241.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFNAX, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.941.00
The chart of Martin ratio for FFNAX, currently valued at 6.46, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.006.466.91
FFNAX
JNBSX

The current FFNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the JNBSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFNAX and JNBSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.33
1.45
FFNAX
JNBSX

Dividends

FFNAX vs. JNBSX - Dividend Comparison

FFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than JNBSX's 5.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FFNAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A
2.39%2.43%2.20%2.14%1.26%1.07%1.65%1.73%1.17%1.36%2.76%5.51%
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
5.44%5.90%5.56%4.60%4.09%3.50%4.03%4.81%3.90%4.40%4.20%4.90%

Drawdowns

FFNAX vs. JNBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFNAX drawdown since its inception was -29.90%, which is greater than JNBSX's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFNAX and JNBSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.42%
-1.13%
FFNAX
JNBSX

Volatility

FFNAX vs. JNBSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) and JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) have volatilities of 2.07% and 2.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.07%
2.06%
FFNAX
JNBSX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab