FFLG vs. QQQ
FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. FFLG is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFLG returned 12.59%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFLG charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
FFLG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
FFLG
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 39.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
FFLG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF | 16.49% | 19.61% | 32.29% | 49.71% | -37.86% | 1.72% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 21.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLG and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FFLG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FFLG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFLG
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
FFLG
QQQ
Communication Services
FFLG
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
FFLG
QQQ
Healthcare
FFLG
QQQ
Industrials
FFLG
QQQ
Financial Services
FFLG
QQQ
Utilities
FFLG
QQQ
Basic Materials
FFLG
QQQ
Real Estate
FFLG
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
FFLG
QQQ
Energy
FFLG
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FFLG
QQQ
FFLG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFLG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 3.51 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.87 | 13.49 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFLG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.64 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FFLG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.52% | -82.97% | +38.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.23% | -11.96% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -22.77% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.52% | -35.12% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.26% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.27% | -32.79% | +18.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.11% | +0.52% |
Volatility
FFLG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.49% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 12.10% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 15.94% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 22.38% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 22.29% | +3.09% |
FFLG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FFLG and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFLG has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLG dropped -44.52% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 12.59% for FFLG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLG.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.13% for FFLG.
FFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLG and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFLG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer