FFLG vs. FDMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) and FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. FFLG is actively managed, while FDMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFLG returned 10.19%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for FDMO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFLG charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDMO.

Performance

FFLG vs. FDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than FDMO's 14.45% return.

FFLG

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 32.21%
• 3Y*: 26.87%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

FDMO

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 31.10%
• 3Y*: 27.66%
• 5Y*: 15.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLG vs. FDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	11.85%	19.61%	32.29%	49.71%	-37.86%	2.32%
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	14.45%	21.43%	32.78%	24.79%	-19.32%	15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and FDMO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.91

The correlation between FFLG and FDMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFLG vs. FDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFLG	FDMO
Technology	52.8%	38.3%
Communication Services	13.5%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	9.8%
Healthcare	6.7%	8.7%
Industrials	5.7%	9.1%
Financial Services	3.1%	11.3%
Basic Materials	1.4%	2.1%
Utilities	1.4%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.7%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	4.0%
Energy	0.3%	3.2%

Return for Risk

FFLG vs. FDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 48
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 53
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLG vs. FDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLG	FDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.75	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.37	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.56	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	9.99	-1.37

FFLG vs. FDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and FDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. FDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than FDMO's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and FDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLG	FDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-33.94%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	-12.22%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	-21.88%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	-25.44%	-19.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-2.80%	-2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.16%	-5.40%	-8.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	3.12%	+0.63%

Volatility

FFLG vs. FDMO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) at 7.76%. This indicates that FFLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLG	FDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	7.76%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.85%	14.60%	+1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.86%	17.88%	+1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.56%	19.25%	+6.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.49%	19.59%	+5.90%

FFLG vs. FDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLG vs. FDMO - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FDMO's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.59%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLG and FDMO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FFLG and FDMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFLG or FDMO?

FFLG has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to FDMO (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLG dropped -44.52% vs FDMO's -33.94%.

Which ETF is better, FFLG or FDMO?

On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 15.71% vs 10.19% for FFLG. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLG or FDMO?

Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 15.71% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLG or FDMO?

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLG or FDMO?

FDMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.13% for FFLG.

What is the main difference between FFLG and FDMO?

FFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLG and 0.29% for FDMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.