FFLC vs. VOO
FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. FFLC is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFLC returned 16.45%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFLC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
FFLC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFLC having a 10.63% return and VOO slightly lower at 10.16%.
FFLC
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.17%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.09M | $5.30M | $5.23M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
FFLC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 10.63% | 17.67% | 27.89% | 25.07% | -0.04% | 24.53% | 19.50% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLC and VOO is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FFLC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FFLC vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFLC
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
FFLC
VOO
Financial Services
FFLC
VOO
Industrials
FFLC
VOO
Communication Services
FFLC
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
FFLC
VOO
Healthcare
FFLC
VOO
Energy
FFLC
VOO
Consumer Defensive
FFLC
VOO
Utilities
FFLC
VOO
Basic Materials
FFLC
VOO
Real Estate
FFLC
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FFLC
VOO
FFLC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFLC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.21 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.92 | 9.44 | -1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFLC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -33.99% | +14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -8.90% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -18.69% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -24.52% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -1.38% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -3.67% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.08% | +0.21% |
Volatility
FFLC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 3.54% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 10.10% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 12.82% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.93% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 18.01% | -0.40% |
FFLC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FFLC and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFLC has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLC dropped -19.72% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 16.45% vs 12.83% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLC.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.99% for FFLC.
FFLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLC and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFLC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer