PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFLC having a 10.63% return and VOO slightly lower at 10.16%.


FFLC

1D
0.86%
1M
0.31%
6M
8.00%
YTD
10.63%
1Y
20.47%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.17%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.09M$5.30M$5.23M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

FFLC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
10.63%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%19.50%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and VOO is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.88

The correlation between FFLC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFLC vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFLC
VOO

Technology

28.9%
38.6%

Financial Services

12.4%
11.4%

Industrials

10.8%
8.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.9%

Energy

4.6%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.5%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

FFLC
28.9%
VOO
38.6%

Financial Services

FFLC
12.4%
VOO
11.4%

Industrials

FFLC
10.8%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

FFLC
10.3%
VOO
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FFLC
10.0%
VOO
9.5%

Healthcare

FFLC
8.6%
VOO
8.9%

Energy

FFLC
4.6%
VOO
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

FFLC
4.0%
VOO
4.5%

Utilities

FFLC
2.6%
VOO
2.2%

Basic Materials

FFLC
2.1%
VOO
1.7%

Real Estate

FFLC
1.1%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFLC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFLCVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.21

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

9.44

-1.52

FFLC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLCVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-33.99%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-8.90%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-18.69%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-24.52%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-1.38%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-3.67%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.08%

+0.21%

Volatility

FFLC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLCVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.54%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

10.10%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

12.82%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.93%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

18.01%

-0.40%

FFLC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFLC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.99%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FFLC and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFLC has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLC dropped -19.72% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 16.45% vs 12.83% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLC.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.99% for FFLC.

FFLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLC and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLC and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer