PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLC vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFLC vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFLC vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
-2.68%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%18.76%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
-4.86%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%23.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -4.86% return.


FFLC

1D
1.02%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
0.18%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*

MGC

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLC vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFLC vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLCMGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.01

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.56

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.64

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.35

7.19

+0.17

FFLC vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLCMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.01

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.72

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.56

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and MGC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFLC vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than MGC's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
1.13%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.01%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and MGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLCMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-51.93%

+32.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-11.93%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-25.74%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-6.33%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-7.12%

+4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.72%

+0.07%

Volatility

FFLC vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 5.54%. This indicates that FFLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFLCMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

5.54%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

9.86%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

18.80%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.26%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

18.19%

-0.41%