FFLC vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FFLC is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFLC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

FFLC vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 8.31% return.

FFLC

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 16.06%
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLC vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	9.17%	3.08%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	8.31%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and GXLC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

FFLC vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 56
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLC	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	—	—

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLC	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-9.08%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-3.05%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-1.54%	-1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFLC	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.56%	13.85%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	13.85%	+3.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	13.85%	+3.84%

FFLC vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLC vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	1.01%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLC and GXLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FFLC and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FFLC or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLC or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLC or GXLC?

FFLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between FFLC and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLC and 0.02% for GXLC.