FFGX vs. EFAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS).
FFGX and EFAS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFGX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 19, 2024. EFAS is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016.
Performance
FFGX vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGX vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | 2.18% | 27.85% | -2.87% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 10.61% | 46.83% | -1.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 10.61% return.
FFGX
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 22.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 40.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGX vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGX vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
FFGX
EFAS
FFGX vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGX | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 2.84 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 3.52 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.57 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.87 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 17.83 | -10.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGX | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 2.84 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.55 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGX and EFAS is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFGX vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than EFAS's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | 1.57% | 1.62% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.52% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
Drawdowns
FFGX vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and EFAS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGX | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -44.38% | +29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -10.29% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -1.10% | -6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -7.19% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.28% | +1.04% |
Volatility
FFGX vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 4.77%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGX | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 4.77% | +4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 8.29% | +5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 14.21% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 15.68% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 18.45% | -0.08% |