FFGX vs. FFEM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FFGX (Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF) and FFEM (Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FFEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFGX returned 22.33% vs 46.94% for FFEM. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFGX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FFEM.

Performance

FFGX vs. FFEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than FFEM's 23.20% return.

FFGX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 5.99%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.20%

FFEM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -2.11%
• 6M: 12.60%
• YTD: 23.20%
• 1Y: 46.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF	$1.53M	$1.01M	$840.57K
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	$1.70M	$929.94K	$561.54K

FFGX vs. FFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	11.97%	27.85%	-9.98%
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF	23.20%	40.03%	-10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FFEM is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	0.86

The correlation between FFGX and FFEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FFEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFGX

FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FFEM

FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 78
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFGX vs. FFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGX	FFEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.76	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.32	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.32	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	3.17	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	9.99	-4.15

FFGX vs. FFEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FFEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FFEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FFEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum FFEM drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FFEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGX	FFEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-18.17%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-14.53%	+1.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.85%	-9.95%	+5.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-3.90%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	4.60%	-0.94%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FFEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) is 7.10%, while Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that FFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGX	FFEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.10%	9.93%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.59%	23.77%	-5.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.38%	26.25%	-5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.79%	25.05%	-4.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.79%	25.05%	-4.26%

FFGX vs. FFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FFEM's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGX vs. FFEM - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than FFEM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF	1.33%	1.59%	0.16%
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	1.55%	1.62%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGX and FFEM in my portfolio?

FFGX and FFEM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGX or FFEM?

FFEM has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to FFGX (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.95% vs FFEM's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, FFGX or FFEM?

On 1-year performance, FFEM leads with 46.94% vs 22.33% for FFGX. On fees, FFGX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FFGX has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFGX or FFEM?

Over the 1-year period, FFEM has performed better with a 46.94% return vs 22.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFGX or FFEM?

FFGX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FFEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFGX or FFEM?

FFGX has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.33% for FFEM.

What is the main difference between FFGX and FFEM?

FFGX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FFEM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFGX and 0.60% for FFEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.