FFGX vs. FFDI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FFGX (Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF) and FFDI (Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past year, FFGX returned 30.36% vs 18.58% for FFDI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

FFGX vs. FFDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than FFDI's 10.72% return.

FFGX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 6M: 18.30%
• 1Y: 30.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFDI

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 10.81%
• 1Y: 18.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FFDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	17.68%	27.85%	-9.98%
FFDI Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF	10.72%	26.66%	-9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FFDI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	0.95

The correlation between FFGX and FFDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FFDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX

FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FFDI

FFDI Risk / Return Rank: 32
FFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FFDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGX	FFDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.06	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.61	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.20	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	1.57	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	5.91	+3.30

FFGX vs. FFDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the FFDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FFDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FFDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FFDI drawdown of -14.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FFDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGX	FFDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-14.39%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-11.85%	-1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-2.59%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.15%	+0.16%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FFDI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) at 5.76%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGX	FFDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	5.76%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.98%	15.39%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.92%	17.58%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	19.73%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.43%	19.73%	+0.70%

FFGX vs. FFDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FFGX and FFDI have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

FFGX vs. FFDI - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FFDI's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FFDI Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF	1.95%	2.16%	0.39%
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	1.47%	1.62%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGX and FFDI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FFGX and FFDI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFGX or FFDI?

FFGX has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to FFDI (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.95% vs FFDI's -14.39%.

Which ETF is better, FFGX or FFDI?

On 1-year performance, FFGX leads with 30.36% vs 18.58% for FFDI. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, FFDI has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFGX or FFDI?

Over the 1-year period, FFGX has performed better with a 30.36% return vs 18.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFGX or FFDI?

FFGX and FFDI have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFGX or FFDI?

FFDI has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.47% for FFGX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.