FFF vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FFF (Founders 100 ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

FFF vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 58.71% return.

FFF

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 5.20%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -12.84%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 58.71%
• 6M: 39.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFF vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFF Founders 100 ETF	-0.98%	-1.84%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	58.71%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FFF and MEME is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

FFF vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFF	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.01	-0.22

Drawdowns

FFF vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFF	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.89%	-48.78%	+26.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.20%	-16.61%	+8.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-29.66%	+19.57%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFF	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.81%	75.50%	-47.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.81%	75.50%	-47.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.81%	75.50%	-47.69%

FFF vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFF vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither FFF nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFF and MEME in my portfolio?

FFF and MEME have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFF or MEME?

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFF or MEME?

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFF or MEME?

FFF and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FFF and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.69% for MEME.