FFF vs. ITOT
FFF (Founders 100 ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Founder ETFs, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. FFF is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
FFF vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 10.84% return.
FFF
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
FFF vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | 0.75% | -1.66% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 10.84% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFF and ITOT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFF vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
FFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITOT
FFF vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFF | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFF vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFF | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.89% | -55.20% | +33.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.59% | -1.09% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -6.95% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
FFF vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFF | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.29% | 12.82% | +14.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 17.47% | +9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 18.25% | +9.04% |
FFF vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFF vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFF and ITOT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.
FFF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.03% for ITOT.
Find the right allocation for FFF and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer