FEZ vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.13%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for XLG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

FEZ vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 11.13%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.23% annualized return.

FEZ

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 7.17%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: 8.57%
• 1Y: 21.04%
• 3Y*: 17.52%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

XLG

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -1.70%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 25.51%
• 3Y*: 22.53%
• 5Y*: 15.57%
• 10Y*: 17.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF	8.27%	37.81%	3.57%	27.16%	-14.27%	14.84%	4.84%	26.04%	-15.85%	24.80%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	5.56%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and XLG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2005	0.73

The correlation between FEZ and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEZ vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEZ	XLG
Financial Services	24.9%	9.5%
Industrials	21.7%	2.0%
Technology	18.0%	45.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	5.5%
Healthcare	5.1%	7.4%
Energy	4.8%	2.6%
Utilities	4.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	0.6%
Communication Services	2.4%	15.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FEZ vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ

FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 35
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEZ	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.86	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.52	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.33	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	2.06	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	7.55	-2.27

FEZ vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEZ	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.21%	-52.39%	-11.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.63%	-12.41%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.85%	-20.70%	+4.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.05%	-28.02%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.69%	-30.46%	-9.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.28%	+3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-7.64%	-9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.00%	3.39%	+0.61%

Volatility

FEZ vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.58%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEZ	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	4.58%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.47%	10.57%	+4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.39%	13.78%	+4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.71%	18.76%	+1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	18.88%	+2.23%

FEZ vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEZ vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than XLG's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF	2.50%	2.78%	2.94%	2.75%	3.06%	2.61%	2.13%	2.61%	3.45%	2.44%	3.35%	3.03%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.61%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEZ and XLG in my portfolio?

FEZ and XLG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEZ or XLG?

FEZ has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to XLG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, FEZ or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.23% vs 11.13% for FEZ. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEZ or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEZ or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEZ or XLG?

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.

What is the main difference between FEZ and XLG?

FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.