PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed NORW with an annualized return of 10.28%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.21%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
10.28%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
5.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and NORW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FEZ and NORW has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FEZ vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
NORW

Financial Services

23.4%
22.6%

Industrials

20.1%
13.3%

Technology

17.9%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
12.5%

Healthcare

5.2%

-

Energy

5.0%
29.4%

Utilities

4.6%
0.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%
10.9%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Financial Services

FEZ
23.4%
NORW
22.6%

Industrials

FEZ
20.1%
NORW
13.3%

Technology

FEZ
17.9%
NORW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
8.6%
NORW
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.4%
NORW
12.5%

Healthcare

FEZ
5.2%
NORW

-

Energy

FEZ
5.0%
NORW
29.4%

Utilities

FEZ
4.6%
NORW
0.7%

Communication Services

FEZ
3.5%
NORW
5.9%

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.5%
NORW
10.9%

Real Estate

FEZ

-

NORW
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEZNORWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

2.18

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

3.00

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.95

-2.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.25

11.27

-7.02

FEZ vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEZNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.18

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.40

-0.10

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-35.62%

-28.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-9.18%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-16.06%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-32.78%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-33.86%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-3.53%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-10.13%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.21%

+0.78%

Volatility

FEZ vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

4.06%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

12.73%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

16.70%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

21.88%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

20.80%

+0.31%

FEZ vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.57%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and NORW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.28% vs 9.61% for NORW. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.57% for FEZ.

FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer