PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUZ vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 10.67%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.23% annualized return.


FEUZ

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.28%
6M
6.13%
YTD
12.32%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
10.67%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

CIBR

1D
2.01%
1M
1.28%
6M
33.32%
YTD
28.86%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
18.23%
ALL TIME*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$122.47M$134.95M$139.60M
$505.93K$296.63K$278.69K

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
12.32%56.34%1.64%17.24%-19.83%11.93%5.04%22.06%-20.61%36.70%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.86%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUZ and CIBR is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.42

The correlation between FEUZ and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEUZ
CIBR

Industrials

27.9%
3.0%

Financial Services

11.3%

-

Energy

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%

-

Utilities

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%

-

Technology

6.7%
94.9%

Real Estate

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Healthcare

5.4%

-

Communication Services

3.5%
2.2%

Industrials

FEUZ
27.9%
CIBR
3.0%

Financial Services

FEUZ
11.3%
CIBR

-

Energy

FEUZ
9.8%
CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FEUZ
8.8%
CIBR

-

Utilities

FEUZ
8.2%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

FEUZ
7.1%
CIBR

-

Technology

FEUZ
6.7%
CIBR
94.9%

Real Estate

FEUZ
5.8%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FEUZ
5.5%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

FEUZ
5.4%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

FEUZ
3.5%
CIBR
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUZ vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEUZ
FEUZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FEUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEUZCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.23

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

2.85

+4.88

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUZ and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUZCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-33.89%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-21.99%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-21.99%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-33.89%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.08%

-33.89%

-14.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-3.06%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-8.62%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

9.49%

-6.15%

Volatility

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) is 4.40%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that FEUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUZCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

7.31%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

22.34%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

25.99%

-8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

25.28%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

23.63%

-2.21%

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUZ vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.43%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
2.65%2.81%2.01%2.95%3.14%2.52%1.46%1.93%2.46%1.29%2.12%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUZ and CIBR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to FEUZ (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUZ dropped -48.08% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.23% vs 10.67% for FEUZ. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FEUZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.23% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.

FEUZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.43% for CIBR.

FEUZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FEUZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEUZ and 0.60% for CIBR.

FEUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUZ and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer