FEUZ vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
FEUZ and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEUZ is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. Both FEUZ and KWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEUZ or KWEB.
Correlation
The correlation between FEUZ and KWEB is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FEUZ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FEUZ:
0.68
KWEB:
0.52
FEUZ:
1.19
KWEB:
1.05
FEUZ:
1.16
KWEB:
1.13
FEUZ:
0.96
KWEB:
0.30
FEUZ:
3.39
KWEB:
1.44
FEUZ:
5.09%
KWEB:
15.46%
FEUZ:
25.35%
KWEB:
42.58%
FEUZ:
-48.08%
KWEB:
-80.92%
FEUZ:
-4.93%
KWEB:
-67.07%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's 3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ has outperformed KWEB with an annualized return of 6.16%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.62% annualized return.
FEUZ
16.02%
-4.86%
8.90%
16.47%
12.65%
6.16%
KWEB
3.32%
-19.74%
-4.06%
21.77%
-6.85%
-0.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEUZ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEUZ vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FEUZ
KWEB
FEUZ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEUZ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than KWEB's 3.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUZ First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF | 1.96% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 3.14% | 2.52% | 1.46% | 1.93% | 2.46% | 1.29% | 2.12% | 1.09% | 0.02% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 3.39% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
FEUZ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEUZ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) has a higher volatility of 17.41% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 15.50%. This indicates that FEUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.