FEUZ vs. KWEB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).

FEUZ and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEUZ is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. Both FEUZ and KWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEUZ First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF	1.44%	56.34%	1.64%	17.24%	-19.83%	11.93%	5.04%	22.06%	-20.61%	36.70%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-16.51%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	58.23%	29.92%	-33.80%	69.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -16.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ has outperformed KWEB with an annualized return of 9.65%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.04% annualized return.

FEUZ

• 1D: 4.03%
• 1M: -8.04%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 6.82%
• 1Y: 37.88%
• 3Y*: 19.97%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 9.65%

KWEB

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -8.47%
• YTD: -16.51%
• 6M: -28.20%
• 1Y: -13.60%
• 3Y*: 0.58%
• 5Y*: -15.40%
• 10Y*: 0.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.

FEUZ

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

Return for Risk

FEUZ vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUZ

FEUZ Risk / Return Rank: 86
FEUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FEUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FEUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FEUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FEUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 88

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEUZ	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	-0.46	+2.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	-0.48	+2.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.94	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	-0.44	+3.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.72	-1.16	+11.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUZ and KWEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEUZ	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	-0.46	+2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	-0.32	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.00	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.07	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FEUZ and KWEB is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than KWEB's 7.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEUZ First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF	2.60%	2.81%	2.01%	2.95%	3.14%	2.52%	1.46%	1.93%	2.46%	1.29%	2.12%	1.09%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.37%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Drawdowns

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEUZ	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.08%	-80.92%	+32.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.92%	-31.36%	+17.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.64%	-75.23%	+36.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.08%	-80.92%	+32.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.39%	-67.12%	+58.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.62%	-34.80%	+24.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	12.05%	-8.68%

Volatility

FEUZ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 8.95%. This indicates that FEUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEUZ	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.44%	8.95%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	19.07%	-6.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.61%	29.53%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.83%	47.64%	-25.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.66%	39.87%	-18.21%