FER.AS vs. ROAD
FER.AS (Ferrovial SE) and ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FER.AS in Infrastructure Operations, ROAD in Engineering & Construction. Over the past year, FER.AS returned 31.42% vs 3.02% for ROAD. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FER.AS is traded in EUR, while ROAD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ROAD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FER.AS achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly higher than ROAD's 2.92% return.
FER.AS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROAD
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -11.20%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 50.20%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- —
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FER.AS Ferrovial SE | 4.04% | 40.71% | 24.16% | 12.52% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 2.92% | 8.15% | 116.68% | 31.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FER.AS and ROAD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FER.AS and ROAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FER.AS vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank
FER.AS
ROAD
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FER.AS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.05 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 0.12 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 0.23 | +5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FER.AS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.06 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.65 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FER.AS drawdown since its inception was -16.10%, smaller than the maximum ROAD drawdown of -50.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FER.AS and ROAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FER.AS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -50.15% | +34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.40% | -24.84% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -20.21% | +11.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -14.74% | +10.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 13.23% | -7.75% |
Volatility
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) is 10.46%, while Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) has a volatility of 14.96%. This indicates that FER.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FER.AS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 14.96% | -4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.15% | 36.06% | -15.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.97% | 47.12% | -16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 45.39% | -6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 49.07% | -9.68% |
Dividends
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison
FER.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while ROAD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FER.AS Ferrovial SE | 1.95% | 1.58% | 1.99% | 2.04% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FER.AS vs. ROAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferrovial SE and Construction Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FER.AS and ROAD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FER.AS and ROAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer