FER.AS vs. WELL
FER.AS (Ferrovial SE) and WELL (Welltower Inc.) are both stocks. FER.AS operates in Infrastructure Operations (Industrials), while WELL operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate). Over the past year, FER.AS returned 31.42% vs 31.87% for WELL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FER.AS vs. WELL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FER.AS is traded in EUR, while WELL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WELL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FER.AS achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than WELL's 10.21% return.
FER.AS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WELL
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 31.87%
- 3Y*
- 37.34%
- 5Y*
- 25.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
FER.AS vs. WELL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FER.AS Ferrovial SE | 4.04% | 40.71% | 24.16% | 12.52% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 10.21% | 32.07% | 52.51% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FER.AS and WELL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FER.AS vs. WELL — Risk / Return Rank
FER.AS
WELL
FER.AS vs. WELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FER.AS | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.12 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 5.81 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FER.AS | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.47 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.47 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
FER.AS vs. WELL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FER.AS drawdown since its inception was -16.10%, smaller than the maximum WELL drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FER.AS and WELL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FER.AS | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -63.07% | +46.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.40% | -15.14% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -8.03% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -12.08% | +7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 5.50% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FER.AS vs. WELL - Volatility Comparison
Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Welltower Inc. (WELL) at 7.62%. This indicates that FER.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FER.AS | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 7.62% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.15% | 17.02% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.97% | 21.82% | +9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 23.54% | +15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 32.19% | +7.20% |
Dividends
FER.AS vs. WELL - Dividend Comparison
FER.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than WELL's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FER.AS Ferrovial SE | 1.95% | 1.58% | 1.99% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 1.47% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 2.84% | 4.18% | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.46% | 5.14% | 4.85% |
Financials
FER.AS vs. WELL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferrovial SE and Welltower Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FER.AS and WELL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FER.AS and WELL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer