PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FER.AS vs. WELL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FER.AS vs. WELL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FER.AS is traded in EUR, while WELL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WELL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FER.AS achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than WELL's 10.21% return.


FER.AS

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
4.04%
6M
-3.73%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WELL

1D
0.49%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
10.21%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
37.34%
5Y*
25.49%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FER.AS vs. WELL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FER.AS
Ferrovial SE
4.04%40.71%24.16%12.52%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
10.21%32.07%52.51%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FER.AS and WELL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2023

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FER.AS vs. WELL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FER.AS
FER.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FER.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FER.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FER.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FER.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FER.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

WELL
WELL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FER.AS vs. WELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FER.ASWELLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.12

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

5.81

-0.14

FER.AS vs. WELL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FER.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the WELL Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FER.AS and WELL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FER.ASWELLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.47

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.47

+0.21

Drawdowns

FER.AS vs. WELL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FER.AS drawdown since its inception was -16.10%, smaller than the maximum WELL drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FER.AS and WELL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FER.ASWELLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-63.07%

+46.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.40%

-15.14%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-8.03%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-12.08%

+7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

5.50%

-0.02%

Volatility

FER.AS vs. WELL - Volatility Comparison

Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Welltower Inc. (WELL) at 7.62%. This indicates that FER.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FER.ASWELLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

7.62%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.15%

17.02%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.97%

21.82%

+9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.39%

23.54%

+15.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.39%

32.19%

+7.20%

Dividends

FER.AS vs. WELL - Dividend Comparison

FER.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than WELL's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FER.AS
Ferrovial SE
1.95%1.58%1.99%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
1.47%1.52%2.03%2.71%3.72%2.84%4.18%4.26%5.01%5.46%5.14%4.85%

Financials

FER.AS vs. WELL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferrovial SE and Welltower Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FER.AS values in EUR, WELL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FER.AS and WELL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FER.AS and WELL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer