PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. CNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEP vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEP achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 33.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FEP has outperformed CNXT with an annualized return of 10.27%, while CNXT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.


FEP

1D
-0.92%
1M
3.14%
YTD
9.99%
6M
15.27%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
24.76%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
10.27%

CNXT

1D
0.88%
1M
10.51%
YTD
33.52%
6M
41.38%
1Y
119.62%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEP vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
9.99%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
33.52%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and CNXT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014

0.35

FEP vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEP
CNXT

Industrials

25.4%
33.2%

Basic Materials

11.3%
4.1%

Energy

11.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
1.2%

Financial Services

9.8%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
2.6%

Utilities

7.1%

-

Real Estate

5.2%

-

Healthcare

4.8%
7.0%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.5%

Technology

3.0%
43.8%

Industrials

FEP
25.4%
CNXT
33.2%

Basic Materials

FEP
11.3%
CNXT
4.1%

Energy

FEP
11.0%
CNXT

-

Consumer Cyclical

FEP
10.7%
CNXT
1.2%

Financial Services

FEP
9.8%
CNXT
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

FEP
8.1%
CNXT
2.6%

Utilities

FEP
7.1%
CNXT

-

Real Estate

FEP
5.2%
CNXT

-

Healthcare

FEP
4.8%
CNXT
7.0%

Communication Services

FEP
3.7%
CNXT
2.5%

Technology

FEP
3.0%
CNXT
43.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEP vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEPCNXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

3.92

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

4.53

-2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.57

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

9.85

-7.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.71

30.18

-20.47

FEP vs. CNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the CNXT Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and CNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEPCNXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

3.92

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.12

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.21

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.22

+0.11

Drawdowns

FEP vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and CNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPCNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-68.98%

+22.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-12.21%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-48.60%

+32.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-61.21%

+22.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-63.30%

+17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-2.15%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-42.94%

+30.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.98%

-0.86%

Volatility

FEP vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) is 5.75%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that FEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPCNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

10.24%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

19.98%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

30.74%

-14.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

35.27%

-15.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

31.64%

-10.91%

FEP vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEP vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

FEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than CNXT's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.13%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
2.97%3.33%4.94%3.27%3.00%3.49%2.32%2.63%2.62%1.65%2.14%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEP and CNXT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNXT has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to FEP (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs CNXT's -68.98%.

On 10-year performance, FEP leads with 10.27% vs 6.63% for CNXT. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEP has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEP has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEP.

FEP has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.

FEP is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNXT is China Equities. FEP tracks Defined Europe Index, while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEP and 0.65% for CNXT.

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and CNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer