PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEP vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEP achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FEP has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 11.34%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.


FEP

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
8.79%
6M
9.16%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
11.34%

QYLD

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.44%
YTD
10.06%
6M
10.12%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEP vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
8.79%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
10.06%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and QYLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.54

The correlation between FEP and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEP vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEP
QYLD

Industrials

26.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

11.6%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
11.4%

Energy

10.2%
0.5%

Financial Services

10.0%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
6.4%

Utilities

6.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

5.0%
0.1%

Healthcare

4.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.6%
14.3%

Technology

3.2%
58.7%

Industrials

FEP
26.0%
QYLD
2.6%

Basic Materials

FEP
11.6%
QYLD
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FEP
11.1%
QYLD
11.4%

Energy

FEP
10.2%
QYLD
0.5%

Financial Services

FEP
10.0%
QYLD
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

FEP
7.8%
QYLD
6.4%

Utilities

FEP
6.8%
QYLD
1.2%

Real Estate

FEP
5.0%
QYLD
0.1%

Healthcare

FEP
4.7%
QYLD
3.7%

Communication Services

FEP
3.6%
QYLD
14.3%

Technology

FEP
3.2%
QYLD
58.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEP vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEPQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.61

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

5.22

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

29.38

-19.69

FEP vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEP vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-24.75%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-4.97%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-19.06%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-24.61%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-24.75%

-21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-0.13%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-3.82%

-8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

0.88%

+2.27%

Volatility

FEP vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.26%. This indicates that FEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.26%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

8.24%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

9.50%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

14.81%

+4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

15.55%

+5.13%

FEP vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEP vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

FEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than QYLD's 12.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
3.01%3.33%4.94%3.27%3.00%3.49%2.32%2.63%2.62%1.65%2.14%2.20%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.45%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEP and QYLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEP has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to QYLD (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, FEP leads with 11.34% vs 10.21% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEP has performed better with a 11.34% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEP.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.36%, compared with 3.01% for FEP.

FEP is categorized as Europe Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. FEP tracks Defined Europe Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEP and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer