FELG vs. ILCB
FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FELG is actively managed, while ILCB is passively managed. Over the past year, FELG returned 27.58% vs 28.03% for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FELG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
FELG vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.
FELG
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
FELG vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 7.70% | 18.44% | 35.45% | 4.20% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELG and ILCB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FELG and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FELG vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FELG
ILCB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FELG
ILCB
Communication Services
FELG
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
FELG
ILCB
Industrials
FELG
ILCB
Healthcare
FELG
ILCB
Financial Services
FELG
ILCB
Energy
FELG
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
FELG
ILCB
Basic Materials
FELG
ILCB
Utilities
FELG
ILCB
Real Estate
FELG
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELG vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
FELG
ILCB
FELG vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.35 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.45 | 3.20 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 3.10 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 14.24 | -8.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.35 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.64 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
FELG vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.89% | -51.53% | +27.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -9.09% | -7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.67% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -6.24% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 1.97% | +2.75% |
Volatility
FELG vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that FELG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 2.88% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 9.10% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 12.02% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 17.13% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 18.16% | +1.73% |
FELG vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FELG vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.44% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FELG and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FELG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 1-year performance, ILCB leads with 28.03% vs 27.58% for FELG. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 28.03% return vs 27.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELG.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELG and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELG and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer