PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDM vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 5.24% return.


FEDM

1D
0.86%
1M
2.92%
YTD
6.95%
6M
8.83%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFI

1D
0.30%
1M
1.60%
YTD
5.24%
6M
6.51%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDM vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and BUFI is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.90

The correlation between FEDM and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDM vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDM vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDMBUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.24

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

8.92

-3.85

FEDM vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDMBUFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.52

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.52

-1.05

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDMBUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-7.43%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-5.69%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.02%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-0.85%

-6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.43%

+1.87%

Volatility

FEDM vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) at 2.16%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDMBUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

2.16%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

7.05%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

8.43%

+7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

9.14%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

9.14%

+7.32%

FEDM vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDM vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.80%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDM and BUFI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDM has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BUFI (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, FEDM leads with 16.72% vs 12.71% for BUFI. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BUFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEDM has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.69% for BUFI.

BUFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDM and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer