FDV vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FDV is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

FDV vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDV

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: 7.34%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDV vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.36%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FDV and GCOW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026	0.50

FDV vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDV	GCOW
Financial Services	15.7%	-
Utilities	15.1%	4.0%
Healthcare	12.8%	14.8%
Consumer Defensive	12.3%	17.0%
Technology	10.7%	1.3%
Real Estate	9.7%	-
Energy	9.3%	22.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	4.8%
Industrials	3.1%	12.6%
Communication Services	2.0%	14.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	8.1%

Return for Risk

FDV vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 60
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDV vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDV	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.42	—

Drawdowns

FDV vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDV	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-37.64%	+34.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-6.93%	+5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-5.83%	+4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDV	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.45%	11.09%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.45%	13.50%	-1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.45%	16.03%	-3.58%

FDV vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDV vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.90%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDV and GCOW in my portfolio?

FDV and GCOW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDV or GCOW?

On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDV or GCOW?

FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDV or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.27% for FDV.

What is the main difference between FDV and GCOW?

They also come from different issuers: Federated and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.60% for GCOW.