FDV vs. KTEC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC).

FDV and KTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDV is an actively managed fund by Federated. It was launched on Nov 15, 2022. KTEC is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the Hang Seng Tech Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2021.

Performance

FDV vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDV vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	8.46%	11.01%	14.41%	-2.16%	1.92%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-12.39%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	11.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDV achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -12.39% return.

FDV

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 11.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KTEC

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: -12.39%
• 6M: -25.44%
• 1Y: -12.67%
• 3Y*: 2.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDV vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

KTEC

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF

FDV

Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

FDV vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDV

FDV Risk / Return Rank: 51
FDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FDV Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FDV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDV vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDV	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	-0.41	+1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	-0.39	+1.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.95	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	-0.42	+1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	-1.00	+5.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDV vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDV and KTEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDV	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	-0.41	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	-0.25	+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between FDV and KTEC is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FDV vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than KTEC's 3.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	2.98%	3.11%	3.12%	3.54%	0.18%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	3.83%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%

Drawdowns

FDV vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDV	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.70%	-66.90%	+50.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-29.36%	+18.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-44.71%	+41.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-43.97%	+39.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	12.39%	-9.64%

Volatility

FDV vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) is 3.08%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that FDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDV	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	9.77%	-6.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	19.86%	-12.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.32%	31.06%	-16.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.78%	43.59%	-30.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.78%	43.59%	-30.81%