FDV vs. KTEC
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. FDV is actively managed, while KTEC is passively managed. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.
Performance
FDV vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
KTEC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -12.58%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 0.64%
- 5Y*
- -7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.37M | $5.52M | $4.30M | |
| $941.66K | $1.10M | $1.04M |
FDV vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 5.51% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and KTEC is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.19 |
FDV vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
KTEC
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
FDV
KTEC
-
Healthcare
FDV
KTEC
Financial Services
FDV
KTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
FDV
KTEC
-
Technology
FDV
KTEC
Real Estate
FDV
KTEC
-
Energy
FDV
KTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
KTEC
Industrials
FDV
KTEC
Communication Services
FDV
KTEC
Basic Materials
FDV
KTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KTEC
FDV vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDV | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDV vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and KTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -66.90% | +63.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -44.83% | +43.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -44.05% | +43.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.47% | — |
Volatility
FDV vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 28.20% | -14.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 42.63% | -28.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 42.75% | -28.94% |
FDV vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than KTEC's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.84% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and KTEC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.78% for FDV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KTEC is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.69% for KTEC.
Find the right allocation for FDV and KTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer