FDV vs. FDVV
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. FDV is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
FDV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.37M | $5.52M | $4.30M | |
| $48.25M | $48.28M | $45.73M |
FDV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 5.51% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 4.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and FDVV is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | 0.38 |
FDV vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
FDVV
Utilities
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
FDV
FDVV
Healthcare
FDV
FDVV
Financial Services
FDV
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
FDV
FDVV
Technology
FDV
FDVV
Real Estate
FDV
FDVV
Energy
FDV
FDVV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
FDVV
Industrials
FDV
FDVV
Communication Services
FDV
FDVV
Basic Materials
FDV
FDVV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDVV
FDV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -40.25% | +36.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -1.12% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -3.76% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility
FDV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 10.37% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 14.68% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 16.91% | -3.10% |
FDV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than FDVV's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.76% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.78% for FDV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.29% for FDVV.
Find the right allocation for FDV and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer