FDV vs. FLKR
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. FDV is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Their -0.74 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
FDV vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- 6M
- 42.86%
- YTD
- 74.91%
- 1Y
- 135.83%
- 3Y*
- 41.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.49M | $5.37M | $4.28M | |
| $58.81M | $52.63M | $54.36M |
FDV vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 5.67% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | -6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and FLKR is -0.74, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.74 |
FDV vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
FLKR
Utilities
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
FDV
FLKR
Healthcare
FDV
FLKR
Financial Services
FDV
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
FDV
FLKR
Technology
FDV
FLKR
Real Estate
FDV
FLKR
-
Energy
FDV
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
FLKR
Industrials
FDV
FLKR
Communication Services
FDV
FLKR
Basic Materials
FDV
FLKR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLKR
FDV vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDV | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDV vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -50.06% | +46.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -22.41% | +21.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -21.96% | +20.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility
FDV vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 53.67% | -40.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 32.31% | -18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 29.86% | -16.45% |
FDV vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than FLKR's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.64% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and FLKR have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.78% for FDV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.09% for FLKR.
Find the right allocation for FDV and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer