PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTRX vs. FKDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDTRX having a 12.36% return and FKDNX slightly lower at 12.20%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDTRX having a 18.67% annualized return and FKDNX not far behind at 18.24%.


FDTRX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.69%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.72%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
18.67%

FKDNX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.66%
YTD
12.20%
6M
10.54%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
18.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
12.36%18.97%31.01%44.92%-40.07%12.90%58.22%36.84%3.22%39.87%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
12.20%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTRX and FKDNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

1.00

The correlation between FDTRX and FKDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTRX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTRX
FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTRXFKDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

4.46

+0.10

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTRX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTRXFKDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.41

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.74

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.67

+0.08

Drawdowns

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTRX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTRX and FKDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTRXFKDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.10%

-51.63%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.39%

-20.49%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-26.23%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.10%

-48.28%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.10%

-48.28%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.14%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-11.25%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

6.57%

-0.05%

Volatility

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) have volatilities of 4.99% and 4.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTRXFKDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

4.99%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

15.86%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.41%

20.41%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

26.20%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

24.61%

0.00%

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTRX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

FDTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, less than FKDNX's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
9.24%10.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.36%0.00%0.71%2.80%1.71%3.44%2.40%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.95%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FDTRX and FKDNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKDNX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to FDTRX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTRX dropped -48.10% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

FDTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTRX and FKDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer