FDTRX vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDTRX (Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both funds - FDTRX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FDTRX returned 18.99%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDTRX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTRX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTRX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 18.99%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.

FDTRX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: 24.50%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 18.99%

QQQ

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 16.45%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: 34.88%
• 3Y*: 26.05%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: 22.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	10.36%	18.97%	31.01%	44.92%	-40.07%	12.90%	58.22%	36.84%	3.22%	39.87%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	16.45%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTRX and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.93

The correlation between FDTRX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDTRX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTRX

FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDTRX	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.95	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.57	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	2.93	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	10.86	-6.69

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTRX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTRX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTRX and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTRX	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.10%	-82.97%	+34.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.39%	-11.96%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.19%	-22.77%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.10%	-35.12%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.10%	-35.12%	-12.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-4.25%	+1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-32.73%	+23.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.62%	3.22%	+3.40%

Volatility

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 9.04% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTRX	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.04%	9.17%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.58%	14.57%	+3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.95%	17.96%	+3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.43%	22.69%	+3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.75%	22.42%	+2.33%

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDTRX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FDTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	9.41%	10.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.36%	0.00%	0.71%	2.80%	1.71%	3.44%	2.40%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDTRX and QQQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FDTRX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDTRX or QQQ?

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to FDTRX (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTRX dropped -48.10% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.