PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDT vs. FGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDT vs. FGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than FGD's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has outperformed FGD with an annualized return of 11.17%, while FGD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.


FDT

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.23%
6M
24.33%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
11.17%

FGD

1D
0.35%
1M
1.25%
YTD
12.92%
6M
13.97%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDT vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
23.23%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
12.92%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and FGD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.84

The correlation between FDT and FGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDT vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDT
FGD

Industrials

34.0%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
8.8%

Financial Services

10.2%
33.6%

Basic Materials

9.6%
6.4%

Energy

9.2%
10.0%

Technology

8.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

5.3%
2.4%

Utilities

5.2%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.3%

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Industrials

FDT
34.0%
FGD
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDT
11.5%
FGD
8.8%

Financial Services

FDT
10.2%
FGD
33.6%

Basic Materials

FDT
9.6%
FGD
6.4%

Energy

FDT
9.2%
FGD
10.0%

Technology

FDT
8.1%
FGD
1.2%

Real Estate

FDT
5.3%
FGD
2.4%

Utilities

FDT
5.2%
FGD
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDT
2.8%
FGD
9.2%

Communication Services

FDT
2.7%
FGD
9.3%

Healthcare

FDT
1.4%
FGD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDT vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDT vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTFGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.23

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

11.28

+2.74

FDT vs. FGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and FGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDT vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and FGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTFGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.10%

-68.05%

+21.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-9.82%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-11.50%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-28.68%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

-44.84%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-0.44%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-12.55%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.81%

+0.73%

Volatility

FDT vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 3.57%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTFGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

3.57%

+5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

9.98%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

12.81%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

14.95%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.21%

+0.41%

FDT vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDT vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than FGD's 5.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.89%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.01%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDT and FGD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs FGD's -68.05%.

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 11.17% vs 10.39% for FGD. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 2.89% for FDT.

FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FGD is Global Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.59% for FGD.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDT and FGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer