FDRR vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDRR tracks the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.13%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

FDRR vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 8.72% return.

FDRR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 26.53%
• 3Y*: 20.07%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 7.68%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 15.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	7.87%	21.70%	20.24%	13.66%	-9.73%	26.06%	8.23%	26.86%	-3.60%	19.29%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	8.72%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-5.30%	21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and SPTM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.93

The correlation between FDRR and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRR vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDRR	SPTM
Technology	38.2%	37.4%
Financial Services	11.3%	11.4%
Communication Services	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	9.3%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.4%
Energy	3.2%	3.3%
Real Estate	2.8%	2.2%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FDRR vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR

FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 74
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 61
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRR	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.93	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.63	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.35	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.77	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.81	12.49	+0.32

FDRR vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRR	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-54.80%	+18.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-8.68%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-18.87%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-24.14%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-2.80%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-9.03%	+5.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.92%	+0.16%

Volatility

FDRR vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.79%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRR	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	4.79%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	9.82%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	12.51%	-1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	16.96%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	18.04%	-1.18%

FDRR vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDRR vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than SPTM's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	2.16%	2.21%	2.61%	2.93%	2.75%	2.09%	2.85%	2.89%	3.20%	2.89%	0.61%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.08%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRR and SPTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FDRR and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDRR or SPTM?

SPTM has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FDRR (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

Which ETF is better, FDRR or SPTM?

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 12.72% vs 12.13% for FDRR. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDRR or SPTM?

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 12.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRR or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FDRR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRR or SPTM?

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.08% for SPTM.

What is the main difference between FDRR and SPTM?

FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.03% for SPTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.