PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRR vs. HLAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRR vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.


FDRR

1D
-0.99%
1M
6.39%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.38%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

HLAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
9.45%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.75%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
10.01%21.70%20.24%13.66%-9.73%26.06%8.23%10.12%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
18.72%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and HLAL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.87

The correlation between FDRR and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRR vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRR
HLAL

Technology

34.5%
50.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

10.7%
16.7%

Healthcare

9.4%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
5.6%

Industrials

8.7%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.9%

Energy

3.6%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.8%

Utilities

2.4%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.5%

Technology

FDRR
34.5%
HLAL
50.4%

Financial Services

FDRR
12.0%
HLAL
0.0%

Communication Services

FDRR
10.7%
HLAL
16.7%

Healthcare

FDRR
9.4%
HLAL
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDRR
8.7%
HLAL
5.6%

Industrials

FDRR
8.7%
HLAL
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDRR
4.8%
HLAL
2.9%

Energy

FDRR
3.6%
HLAL
4.5%

Real Estate

FDRR
2.9%
HLAL
0.8%

Utilities

FDRR
2.4%
HLAL
1.0%

Basic Materials

FDRR
2.2%
HLAL
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRR vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR
FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRRHLALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.85

3.33

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.96

4.62

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.59

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

4.30

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.70

19.85

-4.14

FDRR vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRRHLALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

3.33

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.91

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.89

-0.08

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and HLAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRRHLALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-33.57%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-10.20%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-21.67%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-23.18%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.07%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-5.00%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.20%

-0.20%

Volatility

FDRR vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.08%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRRHLALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.70%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

9.95%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

13.17%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

17.60%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

20.21%

-3.33%

FDRR vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRR vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
2.10%2.21%2.61%2.93%2.75%2.09%2.85%2.89%3.20%2.89%0.61%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.44%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRR and HLAL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FDRR (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 12.34% for FDRR. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDRR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDRR and 0.50% for HLAL.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRR and HLAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer