FDRR vs. HLAL
FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FDRR tracks the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.34%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
FDRR vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
FDRR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- —
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
FDRR vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 10.01% | 21.70% | 20.24% | 13.66% | -9.73% | 26.06% | 8.23% | 10.12% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and HLAL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FDRR and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDRR vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRR
HLAL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
FDRR
HLAL
Financial Services
FDRR
HLAL
Communication Services
FDRR
HLAL
Healthcare
FDRR
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
FDRR
HLAL
Industrials
FDRR
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
FDRR
HLAL
Energy
FDRR
HLAL
Real Estate
FDRR
HLAL
Utilities
FDRR
HLAL
Basic Materials
FDRR
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRR vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
FDRR
HLAL
FDRR vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDRR | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.85 | 3.33 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | 4.62 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.59 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 4.30 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.70 | 19.85 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRR | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 3.33 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.91 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.89 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRR | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -33.57% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -10.20% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -21.67% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -23.18% | +2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.07% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -5.00% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.20% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FDRR vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.08%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRR | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 3.70% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 9.95% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 13.17% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 17.60% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 20.21% | -3.33% |
FDRR vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRR vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.10% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRR and HLAL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FDRR (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 12.34% for FDRR. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDRR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDRR and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRR and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer