FDNI vs. CIBR
FDNI (First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDNI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones International Internet Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDNI returned -8.73%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDNI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
FDNI vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDNI achieves a -18.16% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
FDNI
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -18.40%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
FDNI vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | -18.16% | 25.64% | 22.46% | 1.78% | -38.38% | -20.59% | 85.27% | 38.38% | -8.95% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDNI and CIBR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FDNI and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDNI vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDNI
CIBR
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDNI
CIBR
-
Communication Services
FDNI
CIBR
Technology
FDNI
CIBR
Financial Services
FDNI
CIBR
-
Real Estate
FDNI
CIBR
-
Healthcare
FDNI
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FDNI
-
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
FDNI
-
CIBR
-
Energy
FDNI
-
CIBR
-
Industrials
FDNI
-
CIBR
Utilities
FDNI
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDNI vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FDNI
CIBR
FDNI vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDNI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.20 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.18 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 2.79 | -3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDNI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 1.06 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.66 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
FDNI vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDNI drawdown since its inception was -71.08%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDNI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.08% | -33.89% | -37.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | -21.99% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.22% | -21.99% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.86% | -33.89% | -31.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.38% | -2.81% | -46.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -8.66% | -25.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.27% | 9.25% | +8.02% |
Volatility
FDNI vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) is 7.96%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FDNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDNI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 10.90% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.80% | 20.90% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 24.50% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.63% | 24.95% | +11.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 23.60% | +10.97% |
FDNI vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDNI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDNI vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FDNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | 1.36% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDNI and CIBR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FDNI (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDNI dropped -71.08% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.28% vs -8.73% for FDNI. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FDNI has been the lower-risk option at 7.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.28% return vs -8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FDNI.
FDNI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
FDNI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FDNI tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FDNI and 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDNI and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer