PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.11% return.


FDMO

1D
-0.32%
1M
7.12%
YTD
15.24%
6M
14.87%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*

PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
15.24%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%23.93%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and PIE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.58

The correlation between FDMO and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDMO vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDMO
PIE

Technology

35.7%
47.0%

Financial Services

11.7%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
1.3%

Industrials

10.1%
16.8%

Communication Services

9.8%
1.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
0.4%

Energy

3.5%
5.4%

Utilities

2.3%
1.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.2%

Technology

FDMO
35.7%
PIE
47.0%

Financial Services

FDMO
11.7%
PIE
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDMO
10.1%
PIE
1.3%

Industrials

FDMO
10.1%
PIE
16.8%

Communication Services

FDMO
9.8%
PIE
1.4%

Healthcare

FDMO
8.8%
PIE
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDMO
4.0%
PIE
0.4%

Energy

FDMO
3.5%
PIE
5.4%

Utilities

FDMO
2.3%
PIE
1.3%

Real Estate

FDMO
2.0%
PIE
3.6%

Basic Materials

FDMO
2.0%
PIE
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMOPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.55

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

7.18

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

23.52

-12.72

FDMO vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMOPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

3.24

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.35

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.12

+0.70

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-72.98%

+39.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-9.87%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-28.69%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-40.32%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.17%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-26.08%

+20.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.01%

+0.05%

Volatility

FDMO vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 4.82%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMOPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

9.00%

-4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

17.77%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

21.91%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

20.23%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

21.35%

-1.84%

FDMO vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%0.00%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMO and PIE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to FDMO (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 16.35% vs 7.01% for PIE. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 16.35% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.56% for FDMO.

FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer