FDL vs. VLUE
FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and VLUE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FDL tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index while VLUE tracks the MSCI USA Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDL returned 11.24%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for VLUE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
FDL vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 49.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 11.24%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
VLUE
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 20.77%
- YTD
- 49.00%
- 6M
- 51.40%
- 1Y
- 91.45%
- 3Y*
- 34.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
FDL vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 49.00% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDL and VLUE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and VLUE has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDL vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDL
VLUE
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Energy
FDL
VLUE
Healthcare
FDL
VLUE
Financial Services
FDL
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
FDL
VLUE
Communication Services
FDL
VLUE
Utilities
FDL
VLUE
Industrials
FDL
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
FDL
VLUE
Technology
FDL
VLUE
Basic Materials
FDL
VLUE
Real Estate
FDL
-
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDL vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
FDL
VLUE
FDL vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDL | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.91 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 10.17 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 45.62 | -32.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDL | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 5.32 | -3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.92 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.78 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.76 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
FDL vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDL | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.93% | -39.47% | -26.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -9.04% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -17.89% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -27.12% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.40% | -39.47% | -1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.42% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -6.01% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 2.01% | -0.26% |
Volatility
FDL vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) is 2.85%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that FDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDL | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 8.03% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 13.96% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 17.30% | -6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 17.78% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 19.82% | -2.71% |
FDL vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDL vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than VLUE's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.40% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDL and VLUE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.43% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.40% for VLUE.
FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDL and 0.15% for VLUE.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDL and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer