PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. ROBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.


FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%

ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-1.27%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and ROBT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and ROBT has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
ROBT

Energy

27.3%
1.5%

Healthcare

16.8%
7.4%

Financial Services

15.1%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

14.7%
1.4%

Communication Services

10.6%
4.1%

Utilities

6.5%

-

Industrials

3.8%
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
6.6%

Technology

1.1%
57.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

FDL
27.3%
ROBT
1.5%

Healthcare

FDL
16.8%
ROBT
7.4%

Financial Services

FDL
15.1%
ROBT
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
14.7%
ROBT
1.4%

Communication Services

FDL
10.6%
ROBT
4.1%

Utilities

FDL
6.5%
ROBT

-

Industrials

FDL
3.8%
ROBT
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
3.8%
ROBT
6.6%

Technology

FDL
1.1%
ROBT
57.0%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.3%
ROBT

-

Real Estate

FDL

-

ROBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLROBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

1.42

+4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.56

4.09

+9.47

FDL vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLROBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.32

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.09

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.35

+0.10

Drawdowns

FDL vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and ROBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLROBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-44.47%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-21.66%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-27.68%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-43.26%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.73%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-15.97%

+6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

7.53%

-5.78%

Volatility

FDL vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) is 2.85%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that FDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLROBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

6.46%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

17.51%

-9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

23.32%

-12.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

25.18%

-10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

25.48%

-8.37%

FDL vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and ROBT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDL and 0.65% for ROBT.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and ROBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer