PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 11.09%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.57% annualized return.


FDL

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
11.09%

RDVY

1D
0.47%
1M
4.92%
YTD
13.93%
6M
11.90%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
16.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.30%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
13.93%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and RDVY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and RDVY has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
RDVY

Energy

25.7%
2.4%

Healthcare

17.6%
3.9%

Financial Services

15.2%
33.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.4%
3.4%

Communication Services

10.6%
5.5%

Utilities

6.5%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
10.9%

Industrials

3.9%
13.6%

Technology

1.4%
26.9%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

FDL
25.7%
RDVY
2.4%

Healthcare

FDL
17.6%
RDVY
3.9%

Financial Services

FDL
15.2%
RDVY
33.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
14.4%
RDVY
3.4%

Communication Services

FDL
10.6%
RDVY
5.5%

Utilities

FDL
6.5%
RDVY
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
4.7%
RDVY
10.9%

Industrials

FDL
3.9%
RDVY
13.6%

Technology

FDL
1.4%
RDVY
26.9%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.3%
RDVY

-

Real Estate

FDL

-

RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

3.19

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

13.43

-1.37

FDL vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDL vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-40.60%

-25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-9.04%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-19.11%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-25.32%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-40.60%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-0.94%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-4.98%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.14%

-0.32%

Volatility

FDL vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) is 3.54%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that FDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

5.06%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

11.57%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

14.47%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

18.96%

-4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

21.10%

-3.99%

FDL vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than RDVY's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.71%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.89%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and RDVY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FDL (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.57% vs 11.09% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.57% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for RDVY.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.89% for RDVY.

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer