PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDL having a 18.62% return and GRID slightly higher at 19.50%. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 11.08%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.


FDL

1D
0.39%
1M
3.67%
6M
9.83%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.96%

GRID

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.17%
6M
10.03%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
18.61%
ALL TIME*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.38M$49.50M$43.21M
$102.61M$99.71M$138.67M

FDL vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.62%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
19.50%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and GRID is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.52

The correlation between FDL and GRID shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDL vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
GRID

Consumer Defensive

24.3%

-

Utilities

15.4%
3.9%

Financial Services

13.7%

-

Healthcare

11.7%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Energy

11.1%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
2.4%

Technology

4.3%
12.6%

Industrials

3.6%
23.6%

Basic Materials

0.4%
0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

FDL
24.3%
GRID

-

Utilities

FDL
15.4%
GRID
3.9%

Financial Services

FDL
13.7%
GRID

-

Healthcare

FDL
11.7%
GRID

-

Communication Services

FDL
11.2%
GRID

-

Energy

FDL
11.1%
GRID
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
4.4%
GRID
2.4%

Technology

FDL
4.3%
GRID
12.6%

Industrials

FDL
3.6%
GRID
23.6%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.4%
GRID
0.8%

Real Estate

FDL

-

GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDL vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.62

1.91

+4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.62

6.77

+8.84

FDL vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDL vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-40.56%

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-15.82%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-20.62%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-29.64%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-40.56%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-8.53%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-8.42%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

4.45%

-2.64%

Volatility

FDL vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) is 4.65%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that FDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

8.94%

-4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

20.34%

-11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

23.13%

-11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

21.70%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

22.83%

-5.67%

FDL vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than GRID's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.79%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and GRID have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to FDL (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 18.61% vs 11.08% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.79% for GRID.

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GRID is Infrastructure Equities. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.70% for GRID.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer