FDL vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FDL tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index while FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDL returned 11.24%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.

Performance

FDL vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

FNDX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	24.41%	-5.99%	12.02%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.57%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and FNDX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and FNDX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDL	FNDX
Energy	27.3%	10.3%
Healthcare	16.8%	12.0%
Financial Services	15.1%	14.1%
Consumer Defensive	14.7%	7.4%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.1%
Utilities	6.5%	3.2%
Industrials	3.8%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	9.2%
Technology	1.1%	19.1%
Basic Materials	0.3%	3.7%
Real Estate	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

FDL vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDL	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	3.18	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	4.47	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.59	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.56	5.35	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.56	20.97	-7.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDL vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDL	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	3.18	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.85	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.82	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.79	-0.34

Drawdowns

FDL vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDL	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.93%	-37.72%	-28.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.27%	-6.06%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.24%	-16.30%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.46%	-19.06%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.40%	-37.72%	-3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-0.13%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-3.55%	-6.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.55%	+0.20%

Volatility

FDL vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDL	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	2.25%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.87%	7.25%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	10.22%	+1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.31%	15.18%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.11%	17.50%	-0.39%

FDL vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDL vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDL and FNDX in my portfolio?

FDL and FNDX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDL or FNDX?

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which ETF is better, FDL or FNDX?

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.26% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDL or FNDX?

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDL or FNDX?

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDL or FNDX?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

What is the main difference between FDL and FNDX?

FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDL and 0.25% for FNDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.