FDL vs. EDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDL returned 11.24%/yr vs 9.16%/yr for EDIV. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.

Performance

FDL vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 11.24%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.16% annualized return.

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

EDIV

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: 14.08%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 10.66%
• 10Y*: 9.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	24.41%	-5.99%	12.02%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	6.42%	16.45%	12.75%	41.91%	-15.31%	11.21%	-9.95%	11.80%	-6.16%	28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and EDIV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2011	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and EDIV has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDL	EDIV
Energy	27.3%	3.2%
Healthcare	16.8%	1.3%
Financial Services	15.1%	29.7%
Consumer Defensive	14.7%	12.8%
Communication Services	10.6%	13.8%
Utilities	6.5%	2.5%
Industrials	3.8%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	11.8%
Technology	1.1%	8.4%
Basic Materials	0.3%	1.7%
Real Estate	-	5.1%

Return for Risk

FDL vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 30
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDL	EDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.16	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	1.70	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.22	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.56	1.37	+4.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.56	4.23	+9.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDL vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDL	EDIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	1.16	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.78	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.53	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.17	+0.28

Drawdowns

FDL vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and EDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDL	EDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.93%	-53.36%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.27%	-10.36%	+6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.24%	-13.84%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.46%	-28.32%	+11.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.40%	-40.76%	-0.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-4.07%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-19.36%	+9.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	3.34%	-1.59%

Volatility

FDL vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) is 2.85%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that FDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDL	EDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	4.11%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.87%	10.03%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	12.19%	-0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.31%	13.83%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.11%	17.49%	-0.38%

FDL vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDL vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than EDIV's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.50%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDL and EDIV in my portfolio?

FDL and EDIV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDL or EDIV?

EDIV has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

Which ETF is better, FDL or EDIV?

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.24% vs 9.16% for EDIV. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDL or EDIV?

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDL or EDIV?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDL or EDIV?

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.

What is the main difference between FDL and EDIV?

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDL and 0.49% for EDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.