PortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. FEMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and FEMS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

EDIV vs. FEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.80%
94.90%
EDIV
FEMS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EDIV:

0.95

FEMS:

-0.01

Sortino Ratio

EDIV:

1.39

FEMS:

0.12

Omega Ratio

EDIV:

1.19

FEMS:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

EDIV:

0.96

FEMS:

-0.01

Martin Ratio

EDIV:

2.57

FEMS:

-0.03

Ulcer Index

EDIV:

5.15%

FEMS:

7.36%

Daily Std Dev

EDIV:

14.01%

FEMS:

19.06%

Max Drawdown

EDIV:

-53.35%

FEMS:

-47.85%

Current Drawdown

EDIV:

-5.23%

FEMS:

-11.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than FEMS's -1.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EDIV having a 4.11% annualized return and FEMS not far ahead at 4.21%.


EDIV

YTD

2.49%

1M

-1.10%

6M

-0.64%

1Y

11.22%

5Y*

13.29%

10Y*

4.11%

FEMS

YTD

-1.89%

1M

-2.59%

6M

-3.77%

1Y

-2.41%

5Y*

11.03%

10Y*

4.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDIV vs. FEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FEMS: current value is 0.80%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FEMS: 0.80%
Expense ratio chart for EDIV: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EDIV: 0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EDIV vs. FEMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EDIV is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EDIV is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EDIV is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EDIV is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EDIV is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EDIV is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEMS is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEMS is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEMS is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEMS is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEMS is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEMS is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EDIV vs. FEMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for EDIV, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
EDIV: 0.95
FEMS: -0.01
The chart of Sortino ratio for EDIV, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
EDIV: 1.39
FEMS: 0.12
The chart of Omega ratio for EDIV, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
EDIV: 1.19
FEMS: 1.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for EDIV, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
EDIV: 0.96
FEMS: -0.01
The chart of Martin ratio for EDIV, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
EDIV: 2.57
FEMS: -0.03

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the FEMS Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and FEMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.95
-0.01
EDIV
FEMS

Dividends

EDIV vs. FEMS - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than FEMS's 3.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.18%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.93%5.33%4.84%
FEMS
First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
3.85%3.97%4.65%4.55%6.25%2.90%4.37%4.68%3.39%2.42%3.28%3.48%

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. FEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than FEMS's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and FEMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.23%
-11.19%
EDIV
FEMS

Volatility

EDIV vs. FEMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 8.36%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.36%
10.90%
EDIV
FEMS