EDIV vs. XCEM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM).
EDIV and XCEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDIV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. Both EDIV and XCEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EDIV or XCEM.
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and XCEM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EDIV vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EDIV:
1.39
XCEM:
0.33
EDIV:
2.02
XCEM:
0.54
EDIV:
1.25
XCEM:
1.07
EDIV:
1.85
XCEM:
0.45
EDIV:
5.01
XCEM:
1.24
EDIV:
3.40%
XCEM:
3.82%
EDIV:
12.26%
XCEM:
14.21%
EDIV:
-53.36%
XCEM:
-40.92%
EDIV:
-8.19%
XCEM:
-9.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than XCEM's 1.33% return.
EDIV
11.94%
-1.26%
1.16%
14.98%
6.32%
4.46%
XCEM
1.33%
-1.47%
-3.54%
3.10%
3.44%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDIV vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EDIV vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EDIV vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than XCEM's 2.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 3.47% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.93% | 5.33% | 4.84% | 5.13% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.74% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 3.24% | 8.57% | 1.24% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and XCEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EDIV vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 2.78%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.