FDIV vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
FDIV and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIV is an actively managed fund by MarketDesk. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008.
Performance
FDIV vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDIV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | -0.78% | 2.95% | -37.35% | 6.78% | -9.97% | 10.20% | -2.84% | 15.78% | -5.04% | 6.19% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | -1.71% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than VT's -1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIV has underperformed VT with an annualized return of -1.89%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
FDIV
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- -12.50%
- 5Y*
- -8.22%
- 10Y*
- -1.89%
VT
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDIV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
FDIV
VT
FDIV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 1.25 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | 1.84 | -1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.27 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.83 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.88 | 8.51 | -7.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.25 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.58 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.67 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.40 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIV and VT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDIV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than VT's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 2.93% | 2.95% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.81% | 3.79% | 4.17% | 3.93% | 5.13% | 3.81% | 3.84% | 4.13% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.82% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
FDIV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, roughly equal to the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and VT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.90% | -50.27% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -11.84% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -26.38% | -21.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.90% | -34.24% | -13.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.97% | -6.89% | -32.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -7.08% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 2.55% | +1.19% |
Volatility
FDIV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) is 3.73%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that FDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDIV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 6.33% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 9.95% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 17.24% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 15.98% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.20% | +0.38% |