PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. XAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. XAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has underperformed XAR with an annualized return of 13.67%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.82% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-0.61%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
13.67%

XAR

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.15%
YTD
12.43%
6M
16.39%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
32.47%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
17.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-1.68%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
12.43%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and XAR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.63

The correlation between FDIS and XAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIS vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
XAR

Consumer Cyclical

96.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Technology

0.9%
0.8%

Industrials

0.8%
99.1%

Communication Services

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.9%
XAR

-

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.0%
XAR

-

Technology

FDIS
0.9%
XAR
0.8%

Industrials

FDIS
0.8%
XAR
99.1%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.2%
XAR

-

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
XAR

-

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
XAR

-

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
XAR

-

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

XAR

-

Energy

FDIS

-

XAR

-

Utilities

FDIS

-

XAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISXARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.17

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

6.13

-4.11

FDIS vs. XAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the XAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and XAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISXARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.39

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.68

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.84

-0.24

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and XAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISXARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-46.37%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-17.22%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-19.73%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-32.40%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-46.37%

+7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-7.35%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-6.78%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

6.09%

-1.12%

Volatility

FDIS vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 5.35%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISXARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

9.09%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

22.58%

-9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

27.05%

-8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

23.46%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

24.65%

-2.34%

FDIS vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIS vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than XAR's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.74%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.32%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and XAR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to FDIS (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs XAR's -46.37%.

On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 17.82% vs 13.67% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 17.82% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.35% for XAR.

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and XAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer