PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. GXPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -0.87% return.


FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%

GXPD

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and GXPD is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISGXPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

FDIS vs. GXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISGXPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.26

+0.34

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and GXPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISGXPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-16.61%

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-5.48%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-4.27%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

Volatility

FDIS vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISGXPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

20.01%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

20.01%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

20.01%

+2.28%

FDIS vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FDIS and GXPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPD.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.

FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.15% for GXPD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and GXPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer