PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.34% return.


FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%

FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.65%5.67%26.32%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and FBTC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

-0.89

+1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

-1.23

+2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.86

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

-0.79

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.00

-1.36

+3.36

FDIS vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

-0.89

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.30

+0.31

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-49.33%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-49.33%

+33.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-48.00%

+42.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-16.01%

+8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

28.41%

-23.48%

Volatility

FDIS vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 5.20%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

9.39%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

34.38%

-21.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

43.61%

-25.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

50.13%

-26.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

50.13%

-27.84%

FDIS vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and FBTC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FDIS (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

On 1-year performance, FDIS leads with 9.82% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 9.82% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.25% for FBTC.

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer