FDIS vs. CLIX
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while CLIX is a Long-Short fund tracking the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDIS returned 6.19%/yr vs -6.40%/yr for CLIX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CLIX.
Performance
FDIS vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than CLIX's -6.21% return.
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
CLIX
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- -6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIS vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.65% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 6.43% |
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -6.21% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -39.96% | 90.91% | 17.32% | 6.34% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and CLIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FDIS and CLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIS vs. CLIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
CLIX
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
CLIX
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
CLIX
Technology
FDIS
CLIX
Industrials
FDIS
CLIX
-
Communication Services
FDIS
CLIX
-
Healthcare
FDIS
CLIX
-
Financial Services
FDIS
CLIX
-
Real Estate
FDIS
CLIX
-
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
CLIX
-
Energy
FDIS
-
CLIX
-
Utilities
FDIS
-
CLIX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
CLIX
FDIS vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.62 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 0.97 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 0.66 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 1.81 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.62 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.24 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.17 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and CLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -73.21% | +34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -19.57% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -21.18% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -68.22% | +29.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -44.59% | +39.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -34.70% | +27.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 7.15% | -2.22% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.08% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 15.59% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | 20.89% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 26.94% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 25.92% | -3.63% |
FDIS vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIS vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than CLIX's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.57% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and CLIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIS has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to CLIX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs CLIX's -73.21%.
On 5-year performance, FDIS leads with 6.19% vs -6.40% for CLIX. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CLIX has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 6.19% return vs -6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.57% for CLIX.
FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CLIX is Long-Short. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.65% for CLIX.
CLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and CLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer